![]() OS/2 is working in Parallels Workstation too, so my OS/2 copy is good. But it is working fine in Microsoft Virtual PC - with and without hardware virtualization. ![]() I wasn't succeed - OS/2 freezes at startup screen. I suspected that hardware virtualization is enabled in VBox only when needed, so I tried to install OS/2. I installed VirtualBox 1.6.0 - 1.6.4 and I found that VT-x wasn't working too. I found that almost 1/2 of them was missing VT-x, because of strange motherboard problems, but some of them were working properly with VT-x enabled in Parallels Workstation and Microsoft Virtual PC 2007. Then I guessed that VBox don't work properly with AMD SVM, so I tested it on several Core 2 Duo systems with Intel VT-x. I suspected that my motherboard or my CPU for some weird reason is not working properly with VBox, so I tried it on my other computers - the result was the same: hardware virtualization wasn't working at all with VBox, but it was working very well with VMWare Workstation, Xen, Parallels Workstation. Then I tried several other OS that I already have installed on my PC - both 32 and 64 bit - the situation was the same: I enabled the option, but in running VM I found that it's disabled. ![]() I am using VirtualBox in my home for testing purposes and after some time I found that I can't make hardware virtualization to work with my main home computer. In my work I am using several virtualization products - VMWare ESX, VMWare Server, Parallels, Xen, Microsoft Virtual Server, Microsoft Virtual PC, linux vserver and some other. Yes, I have multiply boot machines in my home and a lot of servers and workstations at my work - I already said I am System Administrator, I am not an ordinary user.
0 Comments
Now think of how many of them tried to attack the hero by climbing through the toilet of a high school bathroom. Think of all the great bad guys in movie history. Awkward but never vulnerable, this Spidey is a brooding genius with a mysterious past even before he gets bitten by a bland CG arachnid, so it’s real tough to buy him as the local dweeb, and borderline impossible to care about him as the neighborhood vigilante.ĭon’t even get me started on the movie’s plastic glow-pop aesthetic, or its weightless CG action, or the fact that its villain looks like he was cut from the “Super Mario Brothers” movie for looking too stupid. ![]() ![]() “Spider-Man” is so much fun because it didn’t have to be cool “The Amazing Spider-Man” is such a slog because it couldn’t afford to be anything else.Īs limp and lifeless as the Coldplay song that it uses to score a flirtatious early scene between Peter Parker (a miscast Andrew Garfield) and Gwen Stacy (Emma Stone), Webb’s take on such time-honored material is safe to the point of sterility. The latter was made for a world where superhero movies had yet to go nuclear, and the former was made for a world that was absolutely soaked in radiation. All the same, it’s still a fascinating piece of corporate product for how it contrasts with the Sam Raimi film that previously told a very similar origin story. The first installment of Marc Webb’s spectacularly ill-fated reboot series swung into theaters with all the enticing freshness of that sweaty leftover meat you should never have put in the microwave, and audiences turned out for it because modern Hollywood is pretty much just an unholy union between Stockholm Syndrome and air conditioning. READ MORE: How “Spider-Man: Homecoming” Will Save Sony’s Summer And Launch Several A-List Careers 5. How did anyone let Electro happen? Who convinced these people that shoehorning Harry Osborn into the story would steer it in the right direction? Why is the great Sarah Gadon playing a building? Did we all die when Peter Parker said that he does “web designs,” making the last three years of life on Earth a collective hallucination like in “Jacob’s Ladder?” And seriously how did anyone let Electro happen?Ī classic case of terrible food and such small portions, the worst part of sitting through “The Amazing Spider-Man 2” might be that the Herculean effort is all for naught in an unprecedented moment of Hollywood cruelty, the movie ends with the promise of a sequel in which a demented Paul Giamatti will terrorize Manhattan from inside a giant mechanical rhinoceros. There are still so many unanswered questions. “The Amazing Spider-Man 2” (2014)Īn 150-minute parade of bad decisions, “The Amazing Spider-Man 2” is a masterpiece of missteps, the “Singin’ in the Rain” of tripping over itself. Here they are, ranked in order from worst to best. “Spiderman: Homecoming” marks the sixth dedicated Spider-Man movie since 2002, and it’s a fascinating next step for a superhero whose movies have represented the highest highs - and the lowest lows - of his genre. After all, what is Peter Parker if not a kid who’s trying to figure out who he is, who he needs to be, and how he’s supposed to fulfill the expectations placed upon him? And while that has made for some frustrating stops and starts along the way (and three different Spider-Men in the span of 14 years), it almost works to the character’s advantage. Whenever Spidey’s web has started to sag under its own weight, the studios have felt free to just wipe the slate clean and start from scratch. Of course, the smallness of his character has a tendency to clash with the Hollywood ethos that bigger is better. ![]() It’s nice to guard the galaxy, but somebody has to keep an eye on Queens. Spider-Man is a friendly neighborhood hero in an age of foreboding cinematic universes. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |